Skip to main content

Week 9 (Oct. 24, 2018): Presentation #2 (Primary & Alternative Design Concepts) Reflection & Eliminating GPS as a Possibility

Earlier this week, to prepare for our presentation on October 24, I looked into different GPS modules. Unfortunately, I concluded that it was not possible to implement one. Recently, I learned in my ME 190 class (Mechatronics System Design) that GPS is not very accurate, as it does not have a fine resolution. Within a 10-meter radius, the satellite cannot distinguish whether the object is at the 1-meter mark or if it’s at the 9-meter mark; in other words, the object that the GPS is attached to will just be a big dot on the map. To illustrate my point, a map is shown below. The top image depicts the position of the GPS user represented by a large dot. That dot covers 10-meters, as the bottom image shows smallest measurement that that can be achieved by zooming in is 10-meters. After travelling nine-meters in one direction, the GPS has not updated the location of the dot. Additionally, the object would have to be travelling faster than 1 m/s; we aimed to have the podcar travel at around 1 m/s, so there is chance that the moving object will still not register on the GPS. Thus, while implementing the GPS would have solved both the collision-avoidance and the location tracking issue, it would not be a viable option for the small-scale model, as the entire track is about two-meters end-to-end.

 

Instead, we will be resorting to using one of the three options: (1) adding a second ultrasonic sensor to the front corner of the podcar, in addition to the sensor that is already on the front of the pod car; (2) installing an IR sensor array; (3) or using a time-of-flight sensor mounted on top of a servomotor to act as a makeshift lidar. Another thing to note is that, currently, the podcars act separately, with each podcar having their own Arduino to control it. If we were to install a centralized master control system that would control all the podcars, this could possibly solve both issues of collision-avoidance and location tracking. The centralized control system would be placed on a tower in the center of the track. A lidar, or if we’re resorting to the time-of-flight sensor mounted on top of a continuous rotation servomotor, would be connected to this central tower to continuously rotate 360 degrees and keep track of all the podcars’ locations. This is something to discuss about with the Small-Scale Track Team, and, should we decide it to be a good idea, possibly ask Dr. Furman about. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 30 (May 8, 2019): Prototype Evaluation Day, Final Circuit, Incorporating 3D printed parts, Final Presentation, Posters, & Maker Faire

Today, we held Prototype Evaluation Day. Like the rest of the senior project classes, the advisor walks around the classroom, evaluating the senior project apparatuses, asking the student teams to demonstrate their devices, and explain their design, though processes, and results. Dr. Furman and Ron examined and inspected the Full-Scale model, then the Half-Scale model, and lastly, us, the Small-Scale Team. We had completed our circuit to power one pod car and one of the two induction charging stations prior to Evaluation Day, so we were able to successfully demonstrate the pod car driving around the track as well as the induction charging. While we were still troubleshooting issues with the tablet’s Raspberry Pi communicating with the Arduino, the Arduino is still capable of operating on its own, so we could at least demonstrate the motor driving the pod car around the track and through the offline stations. Depicted below is our final circuit that powers the pod car: Dep...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 20 (Feb. 27, 2019): Power Electronics – Battery & Amplifier

Since last week, I have been working on the current amplifier for the induction charger. We decided to abandon using the TPS53313 step down voltage regulator-current amplifier IC (rated at a maximum of 6A continuous output current) because we found that supplying +5V to a 3.7V LiPo battery was possible and safe. Additionally, charging a LiPo battery at 6A was found to be dangerous; the battery should be charged at 25% of the capacity rating (.25 x C), or .25 x mAh. In the case of the 6600mAh battery, it should be recharged at a rate of 1.65A or less. The last reason is that dealing with a surface mount device (SMT) is a bit difficult. I started out using a BJT NPN transistor (model: 2N3904), something I was most familiar with. However, its datasheet states that it has a 200 mA maximum continuous collector current rating. This is a significantly low current. Most, if not all, fast charging adapters today have a 2 A charging rate. While I don’t want to charge the LiPo batteri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 0 (Aug. 23, 2018): Beginning Spartan Superway

Hello, and welcome to my Spartan Superway blog! My name is Patrick Barrera, and I am a senior mechanical engineering student with a focus in mechatronics. Once I graduate, I hope to go into at least one of my areas of interest: electronics, programming, biotechnology, and machine learning. Some of my hobbies include staying in shape by working out and biking, doing DIY electronic and coding projects, and spending time with my family. Working on the Spartan Superway project interests me because I would like to be a part of the future ... the future of transportation, the future of technology, and the future of society. I like working in interdisciplinary teams, especially with focuses in mechanical design as well as mechatronics, because I am able to learn things from outside my areas of knowledge. I would also like to expand my knowledge and skill set into areas that I do not know, such as welding and other machine tools, and to get hands-on experience with the concepts I learned fro...
Post a Comment
Read more