Skip to main content

Week 5 (Sept. 26, 2018): Presentation #1 (Goals & Specifications) Reflection & Gimbal Motors


Today, we delivered the first out of three Senior Project Presentations. The objective of our presentation was to discuss our team goals as well as our refined, conclusive design specifications.

Although we stated, in our Presentation #1, that I would oversee the software side of the small-scale model and David would be in charge of the hardware, our duties will more than likely overlap with each other due to the interdependent nature of controls and mechatronics systems. In other words, a circuit and a controller are meaningless without the hardware, and the hardware, such as actuators, cannot be controlled without a programmed controller and driver. And, once again, our duties will also overlap with Small-Scale Bogie and Small-Scale Track, with more interaction with the Bogie team due to the bogie-motor connection.  

Having said this, at the conclusion of our presentation, we received some feedback from Dr. Furman. He brought to our attention brushless gimbal motors, as is used for the cameras found on commercial drones, as another consideration for the selection of the motor to be connected to the bogie. I performed some research into these types of motors.

Brushless gimbals are wound for very low speed (i.e. lots of turns of thin wire) and specifically made to be used in fine control applications. They are A good place to purchase them is at iflight-rc.com. The one found on the website, the iPower Motor GBM5208H-200T, can lift 4 kg-cm, which is equivalent to 0.392 N-m. They are 63 mm in diameter and 24.5 mm in height, making them much smaller and However, it does require 11.1 V to operate and is more expensive, compared to the cheaper 5 V servos I have experience with, making our decision between using a gimbal or servo motor undecisive once again. Although this website does discuss the advantages of each, we still have to consider the power requirement of each motor: 11.1 V will require a larger battery pack compared to 5 V. We will have to consult with the Bogie team to determine what kind of motor will be required to motorize the pod car.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 30 (May 8, 2019): Prototype Evaluation Day, Final Circuit, Incorporating 3D printed parts, Final Presentation, Posters, & Maker Faire

Today, we held Prototype Evaluation Day. Like the rest of the senior project classes, the advisor walks around the classroom, evaluating the senior project apparatuses, asking the student teams to demonstrate their devices, and explain their design, though processes, and results. Dr. Furman and Ron examined and inspected the Full-Scale model, then the Half-Scale model, and lastly, us, the Small-Scale Team. We had completed our circuit to power one pod car and one of the two induction charging stations prior to Evaluation Day, so we were able to successfully demonstrate the pod car driving around the track as well as the induction charging. While we were still troubleshooting issues with the tablet’s Raspberry Pi communicating with the Arduino, the Arduino is still capable of operating on its own, so we could at least demonstrate the motor driving the pod car around the track and through the offline stations. Depicted below is our final circuit that powers the pod car: Dep...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 20 (Feb. 27, 2019): Power Electronics – Battery & Amplifier

Since last week, I have been working on the current amplifier for the induction charger. We decided to abandon using the TPS53313 step down voltage regulator-current amplifier IC (rated at a maximum of 6A continuous output current) because we found that supplying +5V to a 3.7V LiPo battery was possible and safe. Additionally, charging a LiPo battery at 6A was found to be dangerous; the battery should be charged at 25% of the capacity rating (.25 x C), or .25 x mAh. In the case of the 6600mAh battery, it should be recharged at a rate of 1.65A or less. The last reason is that dealing with a surface mount device (SMT) is a bit difficult. I started out using a BJT NPN transistor (model: 2N3904), something I was most familiar with. However, its datasheet states that it has a 200 mA maximum continuous collector current rating. This is a significantly low current. Most, if not all, fast charging adapters today have a 2 A charging rate. While I don’t want to charge the LiPo batteri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 0 (Aug. 23, 2018): Beginning Spartan Superway

Hello, and welcome to my Spartan Superway blog! My name is Patrick Barrera, and I am a senior mechanical engineering student with a focus in mechatronics. Once I graduate, I hope to go into at least one of my areas of interest: electronics, programming, biotechnology, and machine learning. Some of my hobbies include staying in shape by working out and biking, doing DIY electronic and coding projects, and spending time with my family. Working on the Spartan Superway project interests me because I would like to be a part of the future ... the future of transportation, the future of technology, and the future of society. I like working in interdisciplinary teams, especially with focuses in mechanical design as well as mechatronics, because I am able to learn things from outside my areas of knowledge. I would also like to expand my knowledge and skill set into areas that I do not know, such as welding and other machine tools, and to get hands-on experience with the concepts I learned fro...
Post a Comment
Read more